Case 3320907/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr A. Xhemajli (owner and sole trader) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3320907/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mrs K. Omer, Mr J. Vaghela
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Ramute Paplauskiene presented a claim on 3 October 2021 alleging unfair dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy and a detriment and discrimination relating to pregnancy against Euroselect, which the judgment records was Mr A. Xhemajli's trading name. In the claim form she said she did not have an Acas early conciliation certificate and relied on an exemption because she said she was making a claim with another person who had a certificate.
The Tribunal wrote to her on 18 November 2021 and again on 13 December 2021 asking for an Acas certificate or further details of the exemption relied on. At the hearing she accepted that she did not know a certificate was required until the 13 December 2021 letter, after which she contacted Acas and undertook early conciliation; a certificate was issued on 29 December 2021 and the claim was later accepted on 18 January 2022. The Tribunal held that section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 required an Acas early conciliation certificate before proceedings were instituted, that no exception applied, and therefore it had no jurisdiction to deal with the claim. It noted that the claimant could decide whether to present a fresh claim with a certificate and, if so, the Tribunal would then consider jurisdiction and any time-limit issues.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | No merits determination was made. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claim was presented before the claimant had obtained an Acas early conciliation certificate. | Other | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | No merits determination was made. The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claim was presented before the claimant had obtained an Acas early conciliation certificate. | Other | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.