Case 3320914/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K D F Silva de Araujo v Alice Louise Macdonald — 2022
- Case reference
- 3320914/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K D F Silva de Araujo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the time limit for presenting a response had expired on 4 October 2021 and no response had been presented. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided, on the available material, that a determination could properly be made without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,221. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £517.75.
The total awarded to the claimant was £5,740.75. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest or any other remedy component beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent presented no response, and the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on the available material. | Upheld | — | £5,221 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement on the available material. | Upheld | — | £518 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,741
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.