Case 3321023/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Goodrum v Virgin Media Limited; and and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321023/2019
- Decision date
- 4 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Goodrum
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was a preliminary hearing on strike out and amendment before Employment Judge KJ Palmer sitting alone. The claimant's ET1, presented on 30 July 2019, included constructive unfair dismissal, age and disability discrimination, victimisation, reasonable adjustments and a section 14 Equality Act claim. By the time of this hearing, the claimant had already withdrawn all disability discrimination claims other than those arising from the March 2019 interview, and a deposit order remained in place for the live disability claims.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's historic discrimination allegations relating to recruitment events in Autumn 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014, Spring 2015 and Spring 2016. It held that the matters were separate recruitment decisions involving different people and different roles, with no obvious connection and no continuing act for the purposes of section 123(3) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal relied on Hendricks, Owusu, John Arthur and Unilever in reaching that conclusion, and refused to extend time under the just and equitable test because the delay was lengthy, the respondents would be prejudiced, relevant documents and decision-makers were no longer available, and no adequate explanation for the delay was given.
The claimant's application to amend his claim to add direct disability discrimination and perceived disability discrimination was refused under Selkent. The judge found the papers did not clearly plead new direct or perceived disability claims, the application was made nearly a year after the ET1 and around two years into proceedings, and the proposed amendments did not add anything material to the existing section 15 disability-arising case. The remaining claim was left to proceed to a further case-management hearing on 25 August 2021, and no monetary award was made at this preliminary stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Historic discrimination allegations linked to recruitment events in Autumn 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014, Spring 2015 and Spring 2016 were struck out as out of time. The tribunal held they were separate recruitment decisions, not a continuing act, and did not extend time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Owusu v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- John Arthur v London Eastern Railway Limited
- Unilever UK Plc v Hickinson & Anor
- s.123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.