Case 3321034/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Newman v And Foodies Fine Foods Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321034/2019
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Newman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. By letter dated 11 December 2020, after the respondent had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 12 June 2020, the tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out. No sufficient representations were made, so the response was struck out and judgment entered under rule 21.
The tribunal recorded that Mrs J Newman was owed unpaid wages and awarded her £231. It also recorded that she was owed notice pay and awarded £247.50. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to make pension contributions for the claimant and ordered payment of £23.25 as compensation for breach of contract.
No substantive merits findings were set out beyond the rule 21 disposal. The hearing listed for 21 January 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award described as unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Breach of contract | Award described as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £248 |
| Breach of contract | Award described as failure to make pension contributions and recorded as compensation for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £23 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £502
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.