Case 3321044/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Halsall, Counsel v No appearance or — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321044/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Halsall, Counsel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought claims alleging unauthorised deductions and breach of contract. The Respondent filed a response putting the Claimant to proof of what he was owed, later went into administration, and the Administrators gave consent for the claim to proceed.
The Respondent did not attend or have representation at the hearing. The tribunal considered it in the interests of justice to proceed in the Respondent's absence, heard the Claimant's evidence, accepted the accuracy of his schedule of loss, and made awards for excess benefits in kind, pension contributions, and commission earnings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for failure to pay the Claimant in respect of excess benefits in kind. | Upheld | — | £5,320 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for failure to pay pension contributions for the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £1,333 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of commission earnings. | Upheld | — | £33,031 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,684
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.