Case 3321069/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Baker v South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321069/2019
- Decision date
- 13 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Panel members
- Mrs A E Brown, Ms C Tufts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Baker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim. It then recorded that the claimant's claims of automatic unfair dismissal on account of trade union activities and/or having made protected disclosures were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that all disability discrimination claims other than one identified claim were dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claim, that the claimant's dismissal was an act of direct disability discrimination, was dismissed.
The written judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extracted judgment text therefore records the outcomes but not the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Automatic unfair dismissal claim on account of trade union activities was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal claim for having made protected disclosures was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | All disability discrimination claims other than the direct disability discrimination dismissal claim were dismissed on withdrawal. The specific withdrawn disability discrimination causes of action are not identified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claimant's claim that his dismissal was an act of direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.