Case 3321072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Davis v Moto-Build Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321072/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent, Moto-Build Ltd, did not enter a response, and the tribunal therefore found the claimant’s claim succeeded under Rule 21(2) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr C Davis’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £10,593.75.
The hearing listed for 17 April 2020 was cancelled. No separate breakdown of remedy was given beyond the gross sum ordered for the wage claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The respondent did not enter a response, and the tribunal therefore found the claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £10,593.75 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £10,594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,594
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.