Case 3321158/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Stephenson-Gill v Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3321158/2021
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Stephenson-Gill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. The hearing took place at Reading by CVP on 6 and 7 March 2023 before Employment Judge Eeley.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim for lack of jurisdiction. It found that the claim had been presented outside the statutory time limit and that the test for extending time under section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 was not satisfied.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records that written reasons would only be provided if requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the claim was presented outside the statutory time limit and the section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996 test for extension of time was not satisfied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.