Case 3321192/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Llewellyn Smith Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321192/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing. The claimant appeared in person.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £423.48 in respect of unpaid wages, annual leave and car allowance. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment orders one total sum in respect of unpaid wages, annual leave and car allowance without splitting the amount between heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Annual leave is included in the single total award, but the judgment does not identify a separate sum for this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Car allowance is included in the single total award; classification as breach of contract reflects the contractual nature of the allowance, but the judgment does not separately label the legal basis or allocate a separate sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £423
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.