Case 3321205/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321205/2021
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Daley, sitting alone, found that the claimant was entitled to three monetary sums. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal awarded £626.28 gross for unpaid wages, with deductions for income tax and national insurance to be made in accordance with regulation 37A of the Income Tax (Pay as You Earn) Regulations 2003. It also awarded 8 weeks' notice pay calculated from weekly pay of £237.11, totalling £1,896.88.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was owed 7 days' accrued holiday pay, including bank holiday pay, in the gross sum of £663.85. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally and that written reasons would only be provided on request.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claimant was entitled to unpaid wages of £626.28 gross. | Upheld | — | £626 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was entitled to 8 weeks' notice pay of £1,896.88. The written judgment does not label the cause of action expressly; this appears to reflect the notice pay/breach of contract element. | Upheld | — | £1,897 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the claimant was owed 7 days' accrued holiday pay including bank holiday pay of £663.85 gross. | Upheld | — | £664 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,187
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 37A of the Income Tax (Pay as You Earn) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/2682
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.