Case 3321235/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs O ADEDIRAN v Seven Resourcing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321235/2021
- Decision date
- 6 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs O ADEDIRAN
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mrs O Adediran's claim against Seven Resourcing. It recorded that, by a letter dated 4 October 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not replied to the letter dated 11 September 2022 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Laidler ordered that the claim be struck out. No merits findings or financial remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text; it records that the claim was struck out because the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's letter dated 11 September 2022, was given an opportunity by letter dated 4 October 2022 to make representations or request a hearing, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.