Case 3321279/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ian Durham v B&Q Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321279/2021
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ian Durham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Ian Durham, brought a claim against B&Q Limited for unfair dismissal. The case was heard at Watford on 15 and 16 September 2022 before Employment Judge Daley.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal within the meaning of section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was unsuccessful and dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but it does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records only that the unfair dismissal claim under section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 was unsuccessful and dismissed; oral reasons were given at the hearing but no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.