Case 3321283/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Hall v And Elmfield Residential Home Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321283/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 January 2021 the tribunal wrote to Miss P Hall saying an Employment Judge was considering striking out the claim because she had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 18 February 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. She was given until 1 February 2021 to object in writing or request a hearing, but she did not respond.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 37. The reasons state that dismissal followed from non-compliance with the tribunal order and from the claim not having been actively pursued. The judgment does not record any findings on the underlying merits of the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 18 February 2020 and had not actively pursued the claim. The judgment records no merits determination of the underlying claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.