Case 3321296/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321296/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard by telephone at Norwich on 22 April 2020 before Employment Judge Cassel, with the claimant appearing in person and Mr M Humphreys of Counsel for the respondent. The judgment records that the claims of unlawful discrimination were dismissed on withdrawal.
No merits findings are set out in the extracted judgment, and no remedy or award is recorded. The order therefore disposes of the case on the basis of withdrawal rather than any substantive determination of liability.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claims of unlawful discrimination were 'dismissed on withdrawal' but does not separate the discrimination heads in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claims of unlawful discrimination were 'dismissed on withdrawal' but does not separate the discrimination heads in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claims of unlawful discrimination were 'dismissed on withdrawal' but does not separate the discrimination heads in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.