Case 3321323/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Kiszel (First Claimant) Mr C Tompkins (Second Claimant) v Fizz Wine and Cocktail Bar Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321323/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Kiszel (First Claimant) Mr C Tompkins (Second Claimant)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal made awards without recorded attendance or reasons beyond the orders themselves. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the First Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,300 gross, made up of £330 for July 2021, £1,470 for August 2021 and £1,500 for September 2021.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Second Claimant's wages for the period 30 June to 19 July 2021 and ordered payment of £1,015.06 gross. In a separate finding, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the Second Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,240.05.
No discrimination, dismissal, or other substantive findings are recorded in the extracted judgment text. The total amount ordered appears to be £5,555.11, consisting of the three sums awarded under the wages and holiday pay heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the First Claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £3,300, broken down in the judgment as £330 for July 2021, £1,470 for August 2021 and £1,500 for September 2021. | Upheld | — | £3,300 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the Second Claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum of £1,015.06 for the period 30 June to 19 July 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay the Second Claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,240.05. | Upheld | — | £1,240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,555
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.