Mr P Tappis v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2022

Case reference: 3321325/2021
Decision date: 9 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Daniels

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Tappis

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal heard the case at Watford by telephone on 8 and 9 December 2022 before Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone.

The judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No remedy was awarded and no further reasons or legal tests are set out in the extracted judgment text.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claim for unfair dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.