Case 3321349/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Pereira v And Fluor Limited Private Preliminary Hearing (Case Management) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321349/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Pereira
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a private preliminary hearing (case management) held at Reading on 24 February 2020 in case 3321349/2019. The claimant was represented by Miss S Clarke, counsel. The judgment records two claims: religion/belief discrimination and protected disclosures.
The judgment states that both claims were withdrawn by the claimant. It also states that they were dismissed. No merits findings are recorded because the claims did not proceed to a substantive determination.
No remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment. The extracted text does not identify any compensatory figure, interest, or other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the religion/belief discrimination claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to the protected disclosures claim; it was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.