Case 3321358/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Penhallow v Hoyer Gas and Petroleum Logistics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321358/2021
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Penhallow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short oral-reasons judgment recorded by Employment Judge Bedeau at Watford by telephone on 19 August 2022. The tribunal granted the claimant's application to amend the proceedings so that claims for discrimination arising from disability, wrongful dismissal, and accrued unpaid holiday were added.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Application to amend granted to add this claim; no merits determination is recorded in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Application to amend granted to add this claim; no merits determination is recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Application to amend granted to add this claim as accrued unpaid holiday; no merits determination is recorded in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for unfair dismissal for a trade union reason; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Trade union | Claim of detriment for a trade union reason; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.