Case 3321382/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hewlett v Barclays Execution Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3321382/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hewlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings.
The judgment does not set out any findings on liability, remedy, or the substantive merits of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The specific claims are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The specific claims are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The specific claims are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The specific claims are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of the claim. The specific claims are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than set out in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.