Case 3321390/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A O’Sullivan v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321390/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A O’Sullivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claimant's claim succeeds.
No reasons or factual findings are set out in the judgment. The remedy to which the claimant is entitled was left to be determined at a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claimant's claim succeeds, but gives no reasons or separate findings for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claimant's claim succeeds, but gives no reasons or separate findings for this claim. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claimant's claim succeeds, but gives no reasons or separate findings for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment states that the claimant's claim succeeds, but gives no reasons or separate findings for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.