Case 3321408/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Studd v And 54 others Churchill Contract Services Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321408/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Studd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records the disposal of the consolidated proceedings numbered 3321408/2019 to 3321464/2019, excluding 3321431/2019 and 3321445/2019, together with 3311015/2022. It states that the claims of claimants 1-57, excluding claimants 24 and 38, were struck out in accordance with the order of Employment Judge Lewis dated 25 August 2022.
The judgment also records that the claim of Heart Facilities Ltd (In liquidation) was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had been withdrawn. Reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending. No substantive merits findings or monetary award are recorded in this written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims of claimants 1-57, excluding claimants 24 and 38, were struck out in accordance with the order of Employment Judge Lewis dated 25 August 2022. The written judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The claim of Heart Facilities Ltd (In liquidation) was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had been withdrawn. The written judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.