Case 3321470/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Elliott v Axflow Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321470/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Elliott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment, not a merits decision. The tribunal recorded that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 28 February 2021 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
By letter dated 27 April 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Strike-out under rule 37 for failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 28 February 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The extracted text does not repeat the substantive particulars of the underlying claim; the case was listed by GOV.UK as disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.