Case 3321545/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Elliott v John And Dan Bellair Axa Build and Maintenance — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321545/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Elliott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 August 2020, the tribunal gave Mr Elliott an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 10 March 2020 and because it had not been actively pursued. Mr Elliott did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. No substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims were made, and no monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 10 March 2020 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 10 March 2020 and did not actively pursue the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.