Case 3321552/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hughes v And Beeston Hall School Trust Ltd Held by CVP on 22, 23, 26 and 27 April, and in Chambers 14 to 16 July 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321552/2019
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hughes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Hughes was employed as deputy headteacher at Beeston Hall School. He alleged that his dismissal on 1 April 2019 was automatically unfair under s.152 TULR(C)A 1992 because it was for his NASUWT membership and/or union activities. The respondent said the dismissal was because the deputy head role was not working out, with concerns about visibility, deputising, communication, boarding input, report writing and teamwork.
The tribunal found that the respondent knew Mr Hughes was a NASUWT member by 5 December 2018, and that it knew no later than 12 March 2019 that he was acting for NASUWT members at the school. It accepted that he arranged and attended union meetings and later spoke on behalf of members, but it found that the respondent had already been considering dismissal for performance and relationship reasons. The tribunal found that the decision to dismiss had been made by 5 February 2019, before the later March union activity.
The tribunal held that Mr Hughes had not proved that union membership or union activities were the reason, or principal reason, for dismissal. It accepted that union activity formed part of the background and was in the respondent's thought processes, but not at the forefront of the decision. The tribunal instead found that the principal reasons were the breakdown in the working relationship between the Headmaster and the claimant and concerns about his performance in the deputy head role. The appeal panel later upheld the dismissal on the same basis. The claim was dismissed and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Claim under s.152 TULR(C)A 1992 alleging dismissal because of NASUWT membership and/or union activities, including the claimant's role as NASUWT contact/representative and participation in TPS-related meetings. The tribunal found the claim failed because the principal reason for dismissal was the breakdown in the working relationship and performance concerns, not union membership or activities. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.152 TULR(C)A 1992
- Smith v Hayle Town Council [1978] ICR 996
- Ross v Eddie Stobart UKEAT/0068/13/RN
- Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 550
- King v Great Britain China Centre [1991] IRLR 513
- Igen v Wong [2005] IRLR 258
- Sinclair v Trackwork Ltd [2020] UKEAT/0129/20/OO (V)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.