Case 3321659/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Marta Inskip For the v Ms Danielle Fitton — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321659/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Marta Inskip For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a telephone preliminary hearing on 4 June 2020 before Employment Judge Heal, the tribunal recorded that the complaints against the second and third respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying claim labels for those respondent-specific complaints.
The judgment also records that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid annual leave were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings of liability are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The only material outcome recorded in the judgment is withdrawal of the listed complaints. The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaints of unpaid annual leave were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the complaints against the second and third respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal, but does not identify those complaints by legal label in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.