Case 3321682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Hall v Assetsgroup Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321682/2019
- Decision date
- 24 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a single complaint of disability discrimination brought by Mrs P Hall against Assetsgroup Limited. It recorded that, by letter dated 29 February 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the complaint should not be struck out because she had not complied with the tribunal’s order of 1 December 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis struck out the complaint of disability discrimination. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant did not comply with the order dated 1 December 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. By letter dated 29 February 2020 the tribunal invited representations or a request for a hearing, but none sufficient were made. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.