Case 3321690/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Moikeenah v Topsco Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3321690/2019
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Moikeenah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal under rule 37. It had previously written to the claimant on 9 October 2019 inviting representations or a request for a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment also records that the claimant’s remaining claim(s) continued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 9 October 2019, to make representations or request a hearing on whether the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.