Case 3321702/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Katy Lever, FRP Advisory For the v Lee Moran — 2021
- Case reference
- 3321702/2019
- Decision date
- 22 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Katy Lever, FRP Advisory For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent from 19 November 2018 to 21 June 2019. She was paid monthly and, on the tribunal's findings, was due a salary of £1,343.16 per month rising to £1,401.40 from 1 April 2019 after the National Minimum Wage increase. The tribunal also recorded weekly and daily rates of £323.40 and £46.07 respectively.
On the wages claim, the tribunal accepted that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages. It accepted the claimant's calculation of underpayments for November 2018 to March 2019 and April 2019 onwards, then deducted a single post-dismissal payment of £300. The resulting outstanding balance was found to be £1,525.84, which the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to s.1 ERA 1996. It awarded the claimant £646.80 on that claim.
Finally, the tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract because there was no written contract and she was entitled to reasonable notice. Applying s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996, the tribunal found she was entitled to one week's notice because she had been employed for more than one month but less than two years, and awarded £323.40 in damages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to s.13 ERA 1996 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,525.84. | Upheld | — | £1,526 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars contrary to s.1 ERA 1996 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £646.80. | Upheld | — | £647 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in dismissing the claimant without notice and awarded £323.40 in damages. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,496
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.