Case 3321924/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Agboola v Tenancy Deposit Scheme — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321924/2019
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Agboola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in Mr T Agboola v Tenancy Deposit Scheme. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 3 March 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with Rule 37 and with the Tribunal's order dated 4 December 2019.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 16 April 2020 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under Rule 37 after the claimant failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 3 March 2020 and did not request a hearing. The reasons also refer to non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 4 December 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.