Case 3321932/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Maureen Daley v Arriva London North Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3321932/2019
- Decision date
- 25 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford In-person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Maureen Daley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Daley presented her claim on 29 August 2019 and ticked the disability discrimination box. The judgment records that she worked for Arriva London North Ltd as a bus driver and claimed she had been denied a request to work early shifts due to neck pains and had received sick pay, rather than full salary, during a period of sick leave. The respondent denied the claims and averred that the claim was out of time, that the disability was unclear and not admitted, and that the claim was denied.
The matter was listed for a preliminary hearing on 10 June 2022 to determine whether the claim had been presented out of time and, if so, whether time should be extended on just and equitable grounds. The claimant did not attend and did not contact the Tribunal to say she was unable or unwilling to attend. The respondent's representative said the claimant had not communicated with the respondent or its representatives.
Employment Judge Bedeau considered rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. In view of the age of the case, the claimant's failure to attend without good reason, and the judge's review of the file, all claims against the respondent were dismissed under rule 47. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant ticked the disability discrimination box and referred to neck pains, a request for early shifts, and sick pay rather than full salary. All claims were dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- just and equitable grounds
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.