Case 3321950/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Siggers v Record UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321950/2019
- Decision date
- 16 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Siggers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the proceedings in case 3321950/2019, between Mr J Siggers and Record UK Limited, were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability, breach, unfair dismissal, or remedy.
The only dated judicial action in the text is the judgment signed by Employment Judge R Lewis on 3 February 2020 and sent to the parties on 16 February 2020. No hearing reasons, witness evidence, or legal analysis are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim type, but the case listing category included unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim type, but the case listing category included breach of contract. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.