Case 3321998/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Cormack v 3 Sun Inspection Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3321998/2019
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Cormack
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short strike-out judgment in which Employment Judge Ord ordered that the claim be struck out under rule 37. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 16 May 2020 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with tribunal orders dated 14 December 2019 and 6 February 2020.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims, and it records no financial award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately identify the pleaded heads of claim; it states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not separately identify the pleaded heads of claim; it states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify the pleaded heads of claim; it states that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.