Case 3322012/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Soanes v JE Beale plc (in administration) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322012/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis document is a certificate of correction under Rule 69 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It corrects the judgment sent to the parties on 30 June 2020 to state that the respondents are ordered to pay a compensatory award of £1,759.60.
The certificate records that the compensatory award takes account of a Polkey reduction. No further liability reasons, findings of fact, or separate breakdown between heads of loss are set out in the correction notice.
The certificate was signed by Employment Judge Postle on 24 February 2022 and sent to the parties on 1 March 2022. It also states that appeal or review time limits are unchanged and continue to run from the date of the original judgment or original judgment with reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The certificate of correction states that the respondents are ordered to pay a compensatory award of £1,759.60, which takes account of a Polkey reduction. The correction does not restate the underlying liability reasoning. | Upheld | — | £1,760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,760
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,760
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 69 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.