Case 3322030/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Taylor v Carvalet.co.uk Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3322030/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy notice and order dated 16 December 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing, so Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim.
The judgment records no findings on the merits of the underlying complaints and no remedy was awarded. Judgment was sent to the parties on 17 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not set out any separate merits analysis for this complaint; the whole claim was struck out after the claimant failed to respond to the active-pursuit notice. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out any separate merits analysis for this complaint; the whole claim was struck out after the claimant failed to respond to the active-pursuit notice. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.