Case 3322064/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Dianna Praskot v Ace Café London Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3322064/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Dianna Praskot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Dianna Praskot brought a claim against Ace Café London Limited for £369.73 said to be arrears of holiday pay that had accrued on termination of employment. The judgment records that the claim was brought under the Working Time Regulations category and that the sum claimed was for unpaid holiday pay.
The respondent stated at paragraph 6.7 of its response form that it did not wish to defend the claim. On that basis, Employment Judge Loy entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 60 in the amount claimed. The award recorded in the judgment is £369.73.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant claimed £369.73 for arrears of holiday pay unpaid but accrued on termination of employment. The respondent indicated at paragraph 6.7 of its response form that it did not wish to defend the claim, and judgment was entered in the amount claimed under Rule 60. | Upheld | — | £370 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £370
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Rule 60
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.