Case 3322127/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Langley v Atspace Ltd RECONSIDERATION OF — 2019
- Case reference
- 3322127/2019
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Langley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a reconsideration application under Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent applied on 10 December 2019 for reconsideration of the Rule 21 judgment dated 8 December 2019. Employment Judge Postle recorded that the response was required by 17 October 2019 and that the respondent had in fact entered a response on that date.
The judgment states that, because of an administrative error, the response was not placed on the file before the Rule 21 judgment was entered. On that basis, the earlier judgment was entered in error and was revoked. The reconsideration decision is procedural only and does not determine the merits of the underlying employment claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This reconsideration judgment does not determine any substantive employment claim. It revokes the earlier Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had entered a response in time and the earlier judgment was entered in error. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.