Case 3322179/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Absolute Security (London) Ltd (in liquidation)
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Absolute Security (London) Ltd (in liquidation). The tribunal recorded a total award of £990.
- Case reference
- 3322179/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Heal found that Absolute Security (London) Limited (in liquidation) had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Maki's wages. The tribunal accepted that the sum due was calculated by reference to 12 hours for 10 days at £8.25 per hour, producing an award of £990.
No other claim type, legal test, or separate remedy was identified in the extracted text. The judgment records only the wage deduction finding and the resulting monetary order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £990, calculated as 12 hours for 10 days at £8.25 per hour. | Upheld | — | £990 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £990
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.