Case 3322231/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms A. Meredith — 2020
- Case reference
- 3322231/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, before Employment Judge R Lewis sitting alone, heard the matter on 20 and 21 August 2020. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms A Meredith of counsel.
The only outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The tribunal therefore dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons in detail because reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy figures are set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal, sitting alone, found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and the claim failed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.