Case 3322279/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rutkowski v Aldermaston Recycling Limited v — 2021
- Case reference
- 3322279/2019
- Decision date
- 4 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Rutkowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hawksworth, sitting alone at Reading by CVP on 4 June 2021, found that Mr J Rutkowski’s claims for breach of contract and holiday pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered Aldermaston Recycling Limited to pay £7,848.00 in total, made up of £4,708.80 for 12 weeks’ pay in lieu of notice and £3,139.20 for 8 weeks’ holiday pay.
The claimant’s redundancy payment claim failed. The tribunal found that he had been dismissed for capability reasons, rather than because of redundancy. No other remedy was recorded in the written decision, and the tribunal noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Succeeded in relation to 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £4,709 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded in relation to 8 weeks' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £3,139 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed for capability reasons, not because of redundancy. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,848
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.