Case 3322285/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Velmishi v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3322285/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr G Velmishi
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response to the claim, so the tribunal entered judgment in favour of Mr G Velmishi under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment identifies the claim as unfair dismissal.
The tribunal recorded that the Claimant was owed wages and awarded compensation of £2,830.69. The Respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the Claimant.
No further reasons, factual findings, or separate remedy breakdown were given in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response. The judgment labels the claim as 'Unfair Dismissal' and states that the Claimant is owed wages and is awarded compensation of £2,830.69. | Upheld | — | £2,831 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,831
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,831
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.