Case 3322325/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Moseley v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3322325/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Moseley
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the respondents failed to present a response to the claim. It therefore entered judgment in favour of Mr D Moseley.
The tribunal found that Mr Moseley was owed unpaid wages and awarded him £2,548.23 in compensation. The respondents, Adept Facilities Group Limited and Trojan Property Maintenance Limited, were ordered to pay that sum to the claimant.
The decision records no separate liability findings beyond the default judgment process, and no additional remedy elements such as interest or injury to feelings were addressed in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondents did not present a response. The tribunal found the claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £2,548.23. | Upheld | — | £2,548 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,548
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,548
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.