Case 3322336/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McNeill v Oxis Energy Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322336/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McNeill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered by consent on the parties' joint application. The tribunal granted permission for the claimant's claims to proceed against the respondent and the lifting of the moratorium, subject to the conditions agreed by the claimant on 16 December 2021.
The tribunal recorded that Mr D McNeill had been employed by Oxis Energy Limited (in administration) and was dismissed on 28 July 2021 by reason of redundancy. It held that the claim for a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 4 May 2021, the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect, in the sum of £14,124.60. It also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied to the award.
All further proceedings were withdrawn. The tribunal made no order as to costs or interest, and each party was to bear its own costs in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim brought under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; judgment entered by consent. | Upheld | — | £14,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,125
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.