Case 3322341/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Dixon v Travis Perkins plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 3322341/2019
- Decision date
- 18 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of any complaint and makes no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not set out the individual causes of action, but the gov.uk listing categorises the case under unfair dismissal. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not set out the individual causes of action, but the gov.uk listing categorises the case under breach of contract. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not set out the individual causes of action, but the gov.uk listing categorises the case under redundancy. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not set out the individual causes of action, but the gov.uk listing categorises the case under unlawful deduction from wages. The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.