In Person For the v Respondent — 2022

Case reference: 3322386/2021
Decision date: 6 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge R Wood Appearances

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In Person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Mr Nick George, was employed by N & C Glass Limited and promoted to sales director in October 2018. He claimed that his dismissal in July 2021 was not a genuine redundancy and that he should have been consulted more fully, placed into a wider pool, and offered suitable alternative roles. He also claimed there was an express verbal term entitling him to 10% of the company’s net profit each year, with monthly CaptureHub payments said to be part-payment of that bonus.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the genuine reason for dismissal was redundancy, that there was a redundancy situation under s.139 ERA 1996, and that the overall process was fair. The unfair dismissal claim therefore failed.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	The tribunal rejected the allegation that there was an express oral term entitling the claimant to 10% of net profit. It found the CaptureHub payments were not shown to be down payments on a profit-related bonus, and dismissed the claim.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.