Case 3322397/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hampson v GEFCO UK Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322397/2021
- Decision date
- 21 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Hampson
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 June 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr P Hampson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 March 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 16 September 2022 did not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying dispute or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 13 March 2022 and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.