Case 3322398/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ramos v Simy’s Whippy — 2025
- Case reference
- 3322398/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Ramos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Ramos brought a complaint of direct sex discrimination against Simy’s Whippy. The case was heard at Watford on 28 February 2025 before Employment Judge Dick, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending.
The written judgment states that the complaint of direct sex discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. The record indicates that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but the supplied written decision contains only the dispositive finding and does not set out the tribunal’s detailed reasoning.
No remedy was awarded in the written judgment. The record also notes that the judgment was sent to the parties on 26 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment records that the complaint of direct sex discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons are provided in the supplied text. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.