Case 3322430/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Scammell Groundworks Ltd (Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322430/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJenna Carter's claims against Scammell Groundworks Ltd (Liquidation) were heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 8 December 2022 before Employment Judge Allen. The judgment records that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal because of pregnancy succeeded, and that her discrimination claim on the grounds of pregnancy also succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £673.24 for unfair dismissal, £9,062.48 under the discrimination award, and a total of £19,912.76. The judgment notes that grossing up at 40% did not apply because the award was under £30,000.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim because of pregnancy succeeded. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy succeeded; the text refers to pregnancy rather than maternity. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £10,177 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,913
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £673
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £19,240
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.