Case 3322511/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Chanel Whilby v First Rung Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322511/2021
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mensah Date
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Chanel Whilby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard oral evidence from Miss Chanel Whilby at a remote hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal on 4 October 2022, with the Respondent represented by its CEO, Mr Steve Woolcock. The only claim addressed in the written record was unlawful deduction of wages.
The judgment records that, after further information was provided by the Respondent, the Claimant understood that there had in fact been no deduction from her wages and withdrew the claim. The Tribunal nevertheless recorded the order that the unlawful deduction of wages claim was not made out and was dismissed.
No monetary award was made. The written reasons note that, because reasons were given orally at the hearing, written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the Claimant after further information from the Respondent, but the formal order says the unlawful deduction of wages claim was not made out and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.