Case 3322531/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Algieri v Zobi Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3322531/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Algieri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 20 June 2025, the tribunal gave Mr S Algieri an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 18 July 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment was approved by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell Date on 18 September 2025 and sent to the parties on 14 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the specific pleaded heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing category provided in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the specific pleaded heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the GOV.UK listing category provided in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.