Case 3322557/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Nowaczyk v Star Transport & Warehouse Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3322557/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Belton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Nowaczyk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 29 September 2022 at Watford via CVP, before Employment Judge Belton, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaints against Star Transport & Warehouse Ltd. The judgment records that the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's complaints of wrongful dismissal, described in the judgment as being notice pay, and holiday pay were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. No monetary award was made.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested under the rule 61 note. The judgment does not record any further findings on the merits beyond the outcome of each complaint.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded in the judgment as dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant; the claim was for notice pay. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded in the judgment as dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.